Escape to the Psychotropics
Published by Johnmiller on 2009/12/13 (187 reads)
Progressive News and Opinion
The ideas, history, issues and commentaries behind the events of the day
The material on this website is intended to provoke reflective thought on its meaning. It doesn't cure cases of cerebral collapse.
Monday, December 14, 2009
Nelson in the Selkirks, BC Canada / Roosevelt Island, New York City
Image - US | Mrs. Winslow's Soothing Syrup was an indispensable pre-probition aid for mothers and child-care workers. Containing one grain (65 mg) of morphine per fluid ounce, it effectively quieted restless infants and small children. It probably also helped mothers relax after a hard day's work. The company used various media to promote their product such as the one shown here from 1887. Today, kids represent a sychotropic drug goldmine for the psychiatric Trade.
NEW - INTERNATIONAL PRESS ROOM
- The News Stand and Online Magazine Rack
TRANSLATIONS - Today's Issue
- Arabic - - Chinese - - Danish - - Dutch - - French - - German - - Hebrew - - Hindi - - Italian - - Japanese - - Korean - - Portuguese - - Romanian - - Russian - - Spanish - - Swedish - - Turkish
Note - Audio / video / slide show files do not translate.
Improve your reading of any language above.
Click on the language to translate this page. Then drag your pointer over the translaion slowly to recover popup windows of the original English text.
GAIA AND HOMOSAPIENS
***** The Richard Dimbleby Lecture by HRH Prince Charles, titled “Facing the Future”
St James’s Palace State Apartments, London, 7th July 2009 - An Exceptional In-Depth Holistic Call to Wake Up and Act Before It Is Too Late
- Video ^
Jordan Page Pendulum Music Video
- LINK ^
"Listen" By Jordan Page
- LINK ^
Note:The symbol ^ denotes that that article continues at the link.Imaging Life - Escape to the Psychotropics
US | Kids Represent Psychiatric Drug Goldmine for health Care Intustry
Truthout - By Evelyn Pringle - Saturday - December 12, 2009
- LINK ^
Prescriptions for psychiatric drugs increased 50 percent with children in the US, and 73 percent among adults, from 1996 to 2006, according to a study in the May/June 2009 issue of the journal Health Affairs. Another study in the same issue of Health Affairs found spending for mental health care grew more than 30 percent over the same ten-year period, with almost all of the increase due to psychiatric drug costs.
On April 22, 2009, the US Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality reported that in 2006 more money was spent on treating mental disorders in children aged 0 to 17 than for any other medical condition, with a total of $8.9 billion. By comparison, the cost of treating trauma-related disorders, including fractures, sprains, burns, and other physical injuries, was only $6.1 billion.
In 2008, psychiatric drug makers had overall sales in the US of $14.6 billion from antipsychotics, $9.6 billion off antidepressants, $11.3 billion from antiseizure drugs and $4.8 billion in sales of ADHD drugs, for a grand total of $40.3 billion.
The path to child drugging in the US started with providing adolescents with stimulants for ADHD in the early 80s. That was followed by Prozac in the late 80s, and in the mid-90s drug companies started claiming that ADHD kids really had bipolar disorder, coinciding with the marketing of epilepsy drugs as "mood stablizers" and the arrival of the new atypical antipsychotics.
Parents can now have their kids declared disabled due to mental illness and receive Social Security disability payments and free medical care, and schools can get more money for disabled kids. The bounty for the prescribing doctors and pharmacies is enormous and the CEOs of the drug companies are laughing all the way into early retirement.***** Breaking News Alert
Copenhagen climate change conference: world 'has 10 years to reverse trends'
Before the damage becomes irreversible, the Met Office has warned.
Ihe Ielegraph - By Louise Gray, Environment Correspondent in Copenhagen - December 9, 2009
- LINK ^
Copenhagen climate change conference: Thousands March in Copenhagen, Calling for Action
The New York Times - By Tom Zeller, Jr. - December 12, 2009
- LINK ^
COPENHAGEN — Waving a panoply of signs warning that the planet is in peril and that powerful nations should take note, tens of thousands of demonstrators from around the globe took to the streets here on Saturday for the largest protest planned in two weeks of talks on a global strategy to combat climate change. The police and organizers estimated that 60,000 to 100,000 participants joined a long march from Christiansborg Slotsplads, or Castle Square, southward to the Bella Center, the sprawling and heavily fortified convention center where delegates and observers from nearly 200 nations are gathered to seek a consensus.
US | Legislator Sees Echoes of Vietnam in Afghan War
David R. Obey, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, wants a “war surtax” to help pay for the troop buildup.
The New York Times - By Sheryl Gay Stolberg - December 12, 2009
- LINK^
WASHINGTON — David R. Obey has served in Congress since Barack Obama was in grade school. He does not waste time with pleasantries, and he does not mince words. So when President Obama called Representative Obey recently to talk about Afghanistan, the congressman raised a topic sure to make the young commander in chief uncomfortable: Vietnam.“I came here in ’69, and I determined that I would give Nixon a year to see what he could do, because he had inherited the war, so I bit my tongue for a year,” Mr. Obey said, recounting how he reminded the current president of the mistakes of that earlier war. “I said the same thing with Obama.”
In fact, Mr. Obey, a Wisconsin Democrat, did not wait quite a year — Mr. Obama has been in office just 11 months. And his is not an isolated complaint. As the third-most senior member of the House, Mr. Obey gives voice to what Speaker Nancy Pelosi calls the “serious unrest” in her caucus over Mr. Obama’s troop buildup plan for Afghanistan. And as chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, which controls how tax money is spent, he is in a position to constrain the president through the power of the purse.
With the president estimating that the buildup will cost $30 billion, Mr. Obey is proposing a “war surtax.” The idea is unlikely to pass, but it is already reminding the nation of the high cost of an increasingly unpopular war. At the White House, officials are bracing for the president’s first real battle with fellow Democrats.
How the US Funds the Taliban
The Nation - By Aram Roston - November 30, 2009
- LINK ^
On October 29, 2001, while the Taliban's rule over Afghanistan was under assault, the regime's ambassador in Islamabad gave a chaotic press conference in front of several dozen reporters sitting on the grass. On the Taliban diplomat's right sat his interpreter, Ahmad Rateb Popal, a man with an imposing presence. Like the ambassador, Popal wore a black turban, and he had a huge bushy beard. He had a black patch over his right eye socket, a prosthetic left arm and a deformed right hand, the result of injuries from an explosives mishap during an old operation against the Soviets in Kabul.
But Popal was more than just a former mujahedeen. In 1988, a year before the Soviets fled Afghanistan, Popal had been charged in the United States with conspiring to import more than a kilo of heroin. Court records show he was released from prison in 1997.
Flash forward to 2009, and Afghanistan is ruled by Popal's cousin President Hamid Karzai. Popal has cut his huge beard down to a neatly trimmed one and has become an immensely wealthy businessman, along with his brother Rashid Popal, who in a separate case pleaded guilty to a heroin charge in 1996 in Brooklyn. The Popal brothers control the huge Watan Group in Afghanistan, a consortium engaged in telecommunications, logistics and, most important, security. Watan Risk Management, the Popals' private military arm, is one of the few dozen private security companies in Afghanistan. One of Watan's enterprises, key to the war effort, is protecting convoys of Afghan trucks heading from Kabul to Kandahar, carrying American supplies.
Welcome to the wartime contracting bazaar in Afghanistan. It is a virtual carnival of improbable characters and shady connections, with former CIA officials and ex-military officers joining hands with former Taliban and mujahedeen to collect US government funds in the name of the war effort.
In this grotesque carnival, the US military's contractors are forced to pay suspected insurgents to protect American supply routes. It is an accepted fact of the military logistics operation in Afghanistan that the US government funds the very forces American troops are fighting. And it is a deadly irony, because these funds add up to a huge amount of money for the Taliban. "It's a big part of their income," one of the top Afghan government security officials told The Nation in an interview. In fact, US military officials in Kabul estimate that a minimum of 10 percent of the Pentagon's logistics contracts--hundreds of millions of dollars--consists of payments to insurgents.The Afghanistani and Iraqi Quagmire
Obama | The Confused Politician and His Betrayal
New York Review of Books - By Garry Wills - December 2, 2009
- LINK ^
Related - Follow-up to the above | The Nobel War Lecture
Nublear Age Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - By David Krieger, President of the Foundation - December 11,2009
- LINK ^
In accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo, President Obama, one of the world’s great orators and purveyors of hope, gave a speech that must reflect the divisions within himself and his personal struggles to reconcile them. It was a surprising speech for the occasion. Rather than a speech of vision and hope, it was a speech that sought to justify war and particularly America’s wars. The speech was largely an infomercial for war, touting not only its necessity but its virtues, and might well be thought of as the “Nobel War Lecture.”
Afghanistan | War Is Not the Answer
Statement of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - December 2009
- LINK ^
President Obama’s recent decision to send 30,000 additional US troops to Afghanistan is part of a larger trend of escalating violence in a country renowned for being a graveyard of empires. After adding 21,000 US troops to Afghanistan in March 2009, the months of July, August and October 2009 were the deadliest months for US troops in Afghanistan since the 2001 invasion. Continued attacks against civilians have stoked anger and resentment among the people of Afghanistan.
The US invasion and occupation of Iraq have shown that true stability and democracy cannot be imposed through violence. Even with a US force of over 100,000 troops, Iraq remains an extremely dangerous place, with daily bombings, kidnappings and killings. Many people in Iraq still lack basic necessities such as electricity and clean drinking water. By some estimates, more than one million Iraqis have been killed in the war and more than four million have become refugees.
The president’s decision to add nearly 50 percent more US troops to the occupation of Afghanistan will, together with troops from other NATO countries, bring total troop levels to around 150,000 – approximately the same number of troops deployed by the Soviet Union in their failed war in the 1980s.
. . .
Conclusion and Recommendations
The military is the wrong tool for solving our problems in Afghanistan. It is akin to using a chainsaw for surgery rather than a scalpel. The most effective ways to deal with extremist groups, such as al Qaeda, are through international cooperation in intelligence gathering and law enforcement. A recent study by the RAND Corporation shows that only seven percent of terrorist groups were defeated by military force in the past 40 years.
For the reasons set forth above, we urge Congress not to fund additional troops in Afghanistan. Instead, Congress should help in funding the rebuilding of Afghanistan’s infrastructure and support the Afghan people in building institutions of social justice such as schools, courts and health care clinics. Respect for the US in Afghanistan and around the world would increase significantly by providing even a small fraction of the resources currently being spent on the war in Afghanistan for these constructive purposes.
What Should the President Do in Oslo?
But Didn't
Nuclear Age Peace Foundation - By Davud Krieger, President - November 25, 2009
- LINK ^
President Obama will soon be traveling to Oslo to receive the Nobel Peace Prize, one of the highest honors that can be bestowed upon an individual or organization. In Alfred Nobel’s will, he stated that the Peace Prize should be awarded to the person who “during the preceding year…shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses.”
The president will be receiving the award while America remains engaged in wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and continues to make drone incursions in a third country, Pakistan. While he seeks to disengage from the war in Iraq, he has recently announced his decision to expand the war in Afghanistan by sending an additional 30,000 American troops.
Against this background, what might the president say in Oslo? He will, of course, have his own ideas, but here are some thoughts.
First, acknowledge that militarism globally is making the world less secure for a majority of the inhabitants of the planet. The nearly $1.5 trillion spent for military purposes is taking food from the hungry, shelter from the homeless, healthcare from the impoverished, and education from hundreds of millions of the world’s children. He should pledge to reduce the military budget of the United States by half by the year 2015, and call upon other countries to do the same.
Second, recognize the role of inequality in generating conflicts throughout the globe and pledge to use the savings from military budgets in the US to help meet the eight United Nations Millennium Development Goals by the year 2015, starting with dramatically reducing poverty and hunger and promoting education and health care.
Third, call for major reductions in arms transfers that fuel wars throughout the world and pledge that the US will reduce its arms transfers by half by the year 2015.
Fourth, reiterate his and America’s commitment to a world free of nuclear weapons, announcing new and urgent steps to reduce the reliance of the US on nuclear arms, including de-alerting the weapons currently on high-alert status, pledging No First Use of nuclear weapons, and convening the nine nuclear weapons states to begin negotiations on a treaty for the phased, verifiable, irreversible and transparent elimination of nuclear weapons by the year 2020.
Fifth, recognize, as did Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell, that the Nuclear Age demands not only the abolition of nuclear weapons, but the abolition of war. For too long, the US and other countries have sought to prevent war by preparing for it. Now, the time has come to prevent war by preparing for peace. Cultures of peace must be built upon foundations of justice and human dignity. This means that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and the international law that supports these rights, must be respected and adhered to. It also means that human institutions must uphold these rights, and there must be accountability for leaders who violate international law.
Finally, introduce the concept of trusteeship of the earth and its resources as a vital element of building cultures of peace. All of us share in the responsibility to pass the earth on intact to the generations that will follow us on the planet. We are trustees for future generations. We cannot allow global warming to change the climate, the ozone layer to be further damaged, our soil to be depleted, or our atmosphere, rivers and oceans to be polluted beyond recovery.
President Obama might conclude his Nobel Lecture by noting that peace is a sacred right for children everywhere and that all countries, starting with his own, should end the barbaric practice of sacrificing their children at the altar of war. He might observe that if politicians cannot refrain from choosing war, they should themselves go off to fight and leave the young men and women at home to pursue their lives in peace. It would follow that if politicians were to fight their own wars, the institution of war would soon end, and peace would cease to be the intervals between wars. It would be celebrated in all seasons across the globe.
The Disillusion | Obama's Nobel Peace Prize Speech on Afghanistan
Ihe Full text of the U.S. President's remarks delivered at West Point military academy Iuesday, December 1, 2009. The Nobel Committee has made a mockery out of their own award.
- LINK ^
Editor - Why, other than a spontaneous fit of egoism. did he accept ihe Prize, which he has as much admitted he did not deserve? The Nobel Committee has made a mockery out of their own award.Carrumpah-Lobo - The Homosapiens.ki Blog
- GOInternational
Chile | Pinochet's Mad Scientist
Consoriium Newa - By Samuel Blixen - December 9, 2009 (Originally Posted January 13, 1999)
- LINK ^
Consoriium Newa Editor's Note: Chilean Judge Alejandro Madrid has accused the dictatorship of the late Gen. Augusto Pinochet of using poison to assassinate a political rival, former President Eduardo Frei Montalva, who died after surgery in 1982. According to the judge’s indictment released Monday, Pinochet operatives administered mustard gas and thallium to Frei causing his death that was explained at the time as septic shock resulting from stomach hernia operation. Madrid charged three Pinochet associates with Frei's murder.United States Government
The Land Mines Obama Won't Touch
Consortium News - By Bill Moyers and Michael Winship - December 11, 2009
- LINK ^
Consortium News Editor’s Note: President Barack Obama’s well-crafted Nobel Peace Prize speech cited the importance of enforceable standards for international conduct among nations. But, as Bill Moyers and Michael Winship note in this guest essay, the Obama administration still balks at agreeing to an international treaty banning mines:
Many people are troubled that Barack Obama flew to Oslo to receive the Nobel Peace Prize so soon after escalating the war in Afghanistan. He is now more than doubling the number of troops there when George W. Bush left office. The irony was not lost on the President, and he tried to address it in his Nobel acceptance speech.
ACLU Blasts Obama on Bush's Crimes
Consortium News - By Jason Leopold - December 12, 2009
- LINK ^
Despite Barack Obama’s high-minded words about “just wars” and human rights – most recently in his Nobel Peace Prize speech – the U.S. President has shielded officials from George W. Bush’s administration from accountability for torture and other war crimes, prompting stern rebukes from leading advocates of civil liberties.
Shortly after his speech in Oslo on Thursday, Obama came under withering criticism over his administration’s refusal to comply with legal obligations that require all countries to prosecute their government officials implicated in torture.
"We're increasingly disappointed and alarmed by the current administration's stance on accountability for torture," said Jameel Jaffer, director of the ACLU’s National Security Project, during a conference call with reporters. "On every front, the [Obama] administration is actively obstructing accountability. This administration is shielding Bush administration officials from civil liability, criminal investigation and even public scrutiny for their role in authorizing torture." While "the Bush administration constructed a legal framework for torture,” Jaffer said, “now the Obama administration is constructing a legal framework for impunity."
How the War Hawks Caged Obama
Consortium News - By Robert Parry - November 30, 2009
- LINK ^
Two of President Barack Obama’s most acclaimed Cabinet appointments – keeping Republican Defense Secretary Robert Gates and picking former Democratic rival Hillary Clinton to be Secretary of State – set the risky course that his administration is following toward a military escalation in Afghanistan. According to a variety of press accounts, Gates and Clinton proved to be a powerful tandem urging a more hawkish approach to the Afghan War and lending crucial political support to Gen. Stanley McChrystal’s request for tens of thousands of additional troops.
Gates and Clinton more than counterbalanced the more dovish recommendations from Vice President Joe Biden and U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan Karl Eikenberry, a former U.S. military commander in Afghanistan who warned about increasing Afghan government dependence on American forces.
So, as Obama prepares to unveil a plan expected to send about 30,000 more American soldiers to Afghanistan – pushing the U.S. total to about 100,000 or roughly double the size of the U.S. force there when President George W. Bush left office – it looks in retrospect as if the Gates-Clinton appointments a year ago effectively baked in this decision.
Though Washington’s conventional wisdom remains enamored of those two “Team of Rivals” appointments – and especially the bipartisan appeal of the Gates selection – it is increasingly apparent that warnings from the Democratic rank-and-file about the need to make a clean break with Bush-era warmongering carried some real-life wisdom. Instead, Obama went with war-time “continuity” and bipartisanship in keeping Gates and U.S. Central Command Gen. David Petraeus. By doing so, Obama ensured that the “surge” escalation strategy that Gates and Petraeus sold in Iraq would be repackaged for Afghanistan.
Obama Pleases the Neocons
Consortium News - By Robert Parry - December 3, 2009
- LINK ^
President Barack Obama’s escalation of the Afghan War has upset many rank-and-file Democrats who had hoped for a more peaceful strategy, but Obama’s order to dispatch 30,000 more U.S. troops is being welcomed by neoconservatives, a group that has long favored U.S. military interventions in Muslim lands. After Obama’s West Point speech on Tuesday, the neocons gloated over their success in turning the Obama administration’s deliberations on Afghanistan toward an Iraq-like “surge” and away from negotiations aimed at winding down the eight-year-old war.
Obama still hopes for bipartisan support on jobs in small business
WASHINGTON — Despite Republican opposition on Capitol Hill, President Barack Obama said Wednesday that he's still hoping for bipartisan support for his efforts to use financial bailout money to help small businesses and bring down double-digit unemployment.
AP - By Julie Page - December 9. 2009
- LINK ^
Defense | Chaos and Confusion: The Return of the Military Commissions
Truthout - By Andy Worthngton - Wednesday = December 9, 2009
- LINK ^
Bush History | Being Jay Bybee
Consortium News - By David Swanson - December 9, 2009
- LINK ^
Consortium News Editor’s Note: U.S. Appeals Court Judge Jay Bybee earned his judicial appointment the old-fashioned way, by giving his benefactor – President George W. Bush – legal opinions that asserted his powers as essentially unlimited when it came to invading other countries.
In this guest essay, David Swanson explicates Bybee’s moral dilemma and how he put his career path ahead of the lives of Iraqis and American soldiers: It's Oct. 23, 2002, and you're Jay Bybee, the man in charge of the Office of Legal Counsel in the United States Department of Justice. John Yoo and a bunch of other lawyers -- willing to claim that absolutely anything is legal -- work for you.Topical Sections The Arts and Culture
Leonard Cohen | "First We Take Manhattan, Then We Take Berlin" | Music Video
- LINK ^Constitutional and Legal Issues
US | In North Carolina, Lawsuit Is Threatened Over Councilman’s Lack of Belief in God
AP / The New York Times - December 12, 2009
- LINK ^
RALEIGH, N.C. — City Councilman Cecil Bothwell of Ashville believes in ending the death penalty, conserving water and reforming government, but he does not believe in God. His political opponents say that is a sin that makes him unworthy of office, and they have the North Carolina Constitution on their side. Detractors of Mr. Bothwell, who was elected in November, are threatening to take the city to court for swearing him in last week, even though the state’s antiquated requirement that officeholders believe in God is unenforceable because it violates the United States Constitution.
“The question of whether or not God exists is not particularly interesting to me,” said Mr. Bothwell, 59, “and it’s certainly not relevant to public office.”Economy and Finance
Bloomberg Economic News
- LINK ^
Bloomberg Current Worldwide Financial News
- LINK ^
UK | Barclays boss warns of exodus of the bankers from the City of London
The president of Britain's second largest bank has issued a veiled threat that the country's elite financiers could join a mass exodus from the City of London if the Government pushes ahead with a bonus supertax today.
The Independent - By James Moore, Deputy Business Editor - Wednesday, 9 December 2009
- LINK ^
US | More Easy Money for Wall Street
The Nation - By William Greider - December 8, 2009
- LINK ^
The sales pitch for financial-reform legislation pending in the House claims it would put an stop to "too big to fail" bailouts for the leading banks. The reality is the opposite. The federal government would instead be granted unlimited authority to spend whatever it takes to prop up the big boys when they get in trouble. Only in the next crisis, Congress won't have to be asked for the money. The financial rescues will be funded by the secretive Federal Reserve, not the Treasury, with money the Fed itself creates.Economy and Finance
Bloomberg Economic News
- LINK ^
Bloomberg Current Worldwide Financial News
- LINK ^Legal and Constitutional Issues
Bloomberg Index of Current Legal News
- LINK ^Religion and Philosophies
"Churches, like Department Stores, carry the wares that are asked for." - Elbert Hubbard
The Christian Myth of Jesus's Birth
Consortium News - By The Rev. Howard Bess - December 5, 2009
- LINK ^
Consortium News Editor’s Note: In the modern age, religious mythologies – when mixed with politics – have led to very harmful and often bloody consequences, especially involving the leading monotheistic religions: Christianity, Judaism and Islam. So, in this guest essay, Baptist minister Howard Bess reminds Christians that many of their most cherished beliefs about the birth of Jesus were not based on empirical evidence, but on politically motivated mythology:
I do not desire to dim the lights of Christmas, but it might be helpful to some to hear what the stories of Jesus birth are really about.Science & Technology
Bloomberg Index of Current Science News
- LINK ^Social Issues
US | Social Science vs. The Pentagon: Should Anthropologists Go to War?
Time Magazine - By Christopher Shay - December 13, 2009
- LINK ^
For the last two years, the U.S. military has embedded anthropologists and other social scientists with American troops in order to improve the army's cultural IQ. But last week, the American Anthropological Association (AAA) released a report coming out strongly against the program, saying that both in concept and application, it "can no longer be considered a legitimate professional exercise of anthropology."Violence - Civil and Governmental
US | Whatever Mistakes We Have Nade"
Consortiim News - By Nicolas J S Davies - December 11, 2009
- LINK ^
Consortium News Editor’s Note: Though eloquent and nuanced, President Barack Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize speech whitewashed the post-World War II history of U.S. military interventions and covert actions that have killed millions of people and overthrown democracies that have resisted U.S. dictates and desires, from Iran to Chile.
Facing political criticism from the Right for having apologized at all for past U.S. transgressions, Obama circumscribed the bloody truth within a five-word clause, “whatever mistakes we have made.” In this guest essay, Nicolas J S Davies expands on that phrase:
The history of war has long included that of politicians who justify war in the name of peace.
After ordering the deaths of thousands or millions of people, they insist on tormenting the distraught survivors with disingenuous hand-wringing, mythological history and self-congratulation. They demonize their victims, marginalize their suffering, and never apologize.
On Thursday in Oslo, after less than a year in office, President Obama took his place among this parade of the most cynical of historical figures. Before directly addressing the specific role of the United States, Mr. Obama framed the history of warfare in the context of "just war" theory. What he did not explain was that it was the bloody and catastrophic results of such "moral" justifications for war that brought the modern world to the brink of destruction and led it to instead adopt explicit international treaties and the binding prohibitions on the "threat or use of force" contained in the United Nations Charter.Sound and Fury Music Video | Leonard Cohen | "Democracy Is Coming to the USA"
- LINK
About Homosapiens.ki
This website incorporates clips from mainstream and alternative media and, less frequently, blogs, and even obviously biased and counter-point-of-view sources. The clips are taken directly from the websites noted in each source link. Quotation marks are used where they appear in the cited source. All linked articles not noted as "Complete here" are continued at "LINK" citations.
Convert webpages on this site to PDF, print or e-mail by selecting the associated mini-icon at bottom right of each page.
Homosapiens.ki has been developed on the XOOPS website production program.
Subscribe to the email notification as each issue of this site is posted. See top, left of any page.
The editorial offices of Homosapiens.ki are located in New York City and Nelson BC Canada. Website hosting and technical services are provided from Sydney, Australia. The domain name registration ( .ki ) is a service of the Republic of Kiribati ( South Pacific ) domain registrar. Special thanks are due to all those who have assisted in bringing this site to life on the internet.
You may email the editor at
orchill@earthlink.net
In accordancee with TITLE 17 U.S.C. Sectopm 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes, Homosapiens.ki has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of this content nor is Homosapiens.ki endorsed or sponsored by the originator.
Links are provided for access to source articles and for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are sometimes updated by their host sites, a version posted here may not match the version our readers view when clicking the source link on this site.
Privacy - we will not sell, rent, or give your name, address or any other personal information to any entity or person whatsoever at any point in time.
| Navigate through the articles | |
A Changing World - The Nature of Things
|
Jesus and the Politician
|
Voters total: 0
Average: 0


